Skip to main content

Notes on Gautam Bhatia's Article on the Relationship Between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State policy

A few months ago in school, we learnt about the relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy. The prescribed ISC textbook did not provide an adequate explanation. However, my teacher was kind enough to share an article penned by Gautam Bhatia, an eminent Constitutional lawyer, and author who is most famously known for his book, 'The Transformative Constitution'.
Below, I have written a summary/ my notes of the article penned by him.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The constitution was not drafted with an intention for Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles to be related. There was a clear division between the two; Fundamental Rights were enforceable, and remedies existed to ensure the protection of those Rights. On the contrary, Directive Principles were un-enforceable and more ‘guiding’ in nature. The DPSPs were only politically relevant but constitutionally irrelevant. This was H.M Seervai’s understanding of Part IV (DPSPs) of the constitution. After the Re Kerala Education Bill, the Supreme Court opened up the possibility for mutual existence or ‘harmonious construction’. 
The Supreme Court understood the relationship between Part III (Fundamental Rights) and Part IV (DPSPs) in a couple of ways.

Directive Principles as Markers of Reasonableness

The Indian Constitution permits textual limitations to its Fundamental Rights. The Government is allowed to exercise ‘reasonable restrictions’ for the ‘interest of the general public’. The court decided to invoke the DPSPs to determine whether a specific act of the Government was within the ‘reasonable restriction’ that the State should be allowed to exercise. They repeatedly invoked this newly adopted principle. For example, in Cotton Mills v. State of Bombay, the question was whether states could force companies to join collective bargaining agreements and the court decided that in the broader interests of the country, the employer must conform to social legislation. 

In Chandrabhavan v. State of Mysore, the court said that fundamental rights and directive principles were ‘complementary and supplementary’. This was similarly adopted in two important cases in the 70s (Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala and Minerva Mills v. Union of India) in which the Courts rationalised the approach by defining DPSPs as ‘social goals’ and fundamental rights as ‘side-constraints’. The court then moved from a stance of DPSPs being irrelevant to being ‘at par’ with the bill of rights. The only difference is that citizens could not move the court directly to enforce them.

An example in recent times when the court observed that a certain ‘limiting right’ exercised reasonable restraint was during the Right to Education case in which they ruled that since a DPSP was advanced, the 25% quota was not in ‘clear conflict’.

Directive Principles as Interpretive Guides

After the court had in its judgements invoked Directive Principles in legal adjudication, it soon took the next possible step – using them as interpretive guides. 

An interesting case in which this was done is Balwant Raj v. Union of India, a 1966 judgement of the Allahabad High Court. An employee of the Indian Railways had contracted tuberculosis and was axed from the railways because of the ‘failure to resume duty’. Balwant Raj read the directive principle that required the State to secure the right to work in such a manner that it included only voluntary failures, but his failure was involuntary as it was due to TB. They justified this by saying that the rule that had initially resulted in his discharge from service had to be done in accordance and spirit of the DPSPs.

The court treated the Directive Principles in such a way in which it could infuse it into the law without directly enforcing them. The court has so far failed to define a coherent and precise role that the principles are meant to play in statutory interpretation. In the case of the Tamil Nadu Government handing out free television sets as gifts, the court ruled that it was valid ‘public purpose’ because it was carried out to fulfil a directive principle. 

Directive Principles as Framework Values

The consequences of the court shifting its opinion on the relevance of directive principles are incredibly crucial. On the question of affirmative action or reservation for certain communities based on caste, one can argue that it violated the right to equality or Article 16 that guaranteed the equality of opportunity in employment. It must have been a simple equal-opportunities case. However, the court thought differently. 

The court said that if the State wanted to give equal opportunity for the Depressed Classes, it would have to take note of their social and economic standing as well as the historically unequal treatment that has resulted in differential treatment being meted out to them and hence has a role of securing jobs, old age pension, medical care etc. The idea that the State has a role or obligation to help weaker sections of society has been increasingly accepted in Constitutional law. Justice Bhagwati in his opinion on the Minerva Mills case said that even when something may ‘clash with a formalistic and doctrinaire view of equality before the law……. conform to the principle of…….equality before the law in its total magnitude and dimension”. By this, Bhagwati meant that even if on the face of it, it was unequal and caused discrimination (if one read the law as it is typed), if one considered the greater good or the overall ‘magnitude and dimension’, it would be beneficial. As Ashok Kumar Thakur said, the principles of equality could be altered to carry out the Directive Principles.

You can read the full article here.

Comments

  1. Respected sir, I am fan of your blog. Myself Ramesh, third year law student at government law college mysuru. You have natural gift in writing. Wanting to make small correction sir. Justice Bhagwati was a man. You refer to honourable lordship as her. Kindly change.. continue good work...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your kind comments and useful feedback. It has been corrected now! Apologies

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Visiting the Kasturinagar (KA-03) RTO - a tumultuous but manageable experience to get a Learner's/ Driver's License without an agent/ driving school

Ask anyone, and I can guarantee that they will have a story (and in most cases, many stories) about their trip, or rather, numerous trips to the RTO for something as simple as getting a Learner's License (LL) or a Driver's License (DL). In this blog, I hope to make your life a tad bit easier by guiding you through the entire process, which may seem easy at first but is full of (overcome able) challenges if you know what you are doing. I turned 18 in January this year, and besides cutting a cake, I worked on my LL application online. I challenged myself to complete the entire LL to DL process by myself and without the help of an agent or a driving school, unlike what the majority do. The lengthy application process and multiple visits to the RTO, impressed upon me why most people decided to pay a little extra to get an agent to do it for them. Still, I was determined not to pay a single rupee more than the official cost. I succeeded.  Do note that this answer is concerning the K

Kicking off a 'political career' in an idea-based, grassroots level political party

Despite having been following politics for the longest time, and now studying it full time, I never joined a political party. When people used to ask me "who do you support?", my answer was standard, "no one". Luckily for me, ever since turning 18 and being eligible to vote, there hasn't been an election in which I'd be forced to cast my vote and tell people that I have made a definitive choice about a particular political party. At a time when politics has become ever so polarising and dirty, I couldn't be happier to associate myself with the BNP. It was in February 2020 that I was introduced to the Bengaluru NavaNiramana Party. I found their vision, leadership and ideas incredibly refreshing. Though I was aware of their launch/ kickoff meeting that took place in Freedom Park in early 2020, due to a friend's TEDx talk taking place simultaneously, I could not attend. Then, between Board Exams and the lockdown that took us all by surprise, I forgot ab

Living life out of a suitcase

  December 2022 As I sit on my fourteenth flight for the year, with two more scheduled before the curtains are drawn on 2022 (god bless my carbon footprint), laptop open, a glass of wine and a blank word document, I begin to ponder over my journey over the last few months. Penning it down and (at the risk of sounding philosophical) ‘reflecting’ on this journey seems imperative.  --- May 2022   After two wonderful years of ups and downs in Le Havre (thank you, COVID-19!), I said my good-byes, packed my bags and was on the train to Paris. But that was not my final destination – for now at least. After spending two nights at a friend’s, dropping my baggage off at a relative’s, catching the French Open and a round of golf in the middle, and a train to Beauvais (an hour north of Paris), I was on a flight to Barcelona. Checked in to my hostel, met my friend, went for 3 days of the Barcelona Formula 1 Grand Prix together, watched a Redbull 1-2 finish, celebrated with beer, sangria and tapas,

Climbing Trees

I like to climb trees. I climb some thick trees in my apartment. Now we play games on the tree also. Right now we have invented three games. First one- whoever can reach top of the tree is the winner (Invented by Sanjith Rao). Second- We lock someone in a small jail like thing and then we climb on the tree and get out (Invented by Sanjith Rao). 3rd- We hide on trees and then someone on a cycle has to catch us. (Best Game)(Invented by Sanjna Rao my sister and me) Here is a picture of me climbing a tree:

Sustainable Bitcoin Mining

Source Bitcoin mining has become popular amongst people with large data processors and also fintech-geeks who are interested in the world of mining. Mining is at times not very profitable due to the increase in complexity of problems given to miners (as more and more Bitcoins are mined) and electricity and other expensive overheads. According to NZ Herald , "Bitcoin mining uses so much energy that it could cause blackouts". The repercussions due to this is that an American city known as Platssburgh has already banned cryptocurrency mining for 18 months and Iceland believes that more energy will be used to mine Bitcoin rather than power their houses this year! The need for a sustainable model for mining is prevalent. With the introduction of cloud mining, many "non-techy" users have been able to mine Bitcoins by buying Hash power from various companies and making them mine Bitcoins for you. All you need to do is invest a particular amount and leave the rest of

Wizard 101

Wizard101 is a free game you can play. Wizard101 is created by the company KingsIsle. In Wizard101 you have quests to accomplish. In some quests you have to fight monsters. By fighting monsters you sometimes get things like pet snacks, robes to wear, hats to wear etc. In Wizard101 you have 2 types of spell cards, they are- Treasure cards and Trained cards. Once you use a treasure card you loose it. The advantage of using a treasure card is that it gives more damage on the monster you are trying to kill. Trained cards give less damage but you have them forever. You also have spell decks in which you have to keep your spells in. There are different spell decks. By default your wizard will have the starter's deck. After you pass levels you can buy different decks. I am right now in level 10 and I have 3 Decks, they are- Starter's Deck Pinewood Deck Novice's Life Deck The Starter's Deck can store only 12 cards. The Pinewood Deck can store 16 cards. The Novice's Life

How I Spent My Dasara Vacation (Sneak Preview)

Day 1 (24th September) I woke up at 8.00a.m. I quickly got ready and then had breakfast at 9.00a.m. I quickly had a bath and then played on the computer for 15 minutes. Then at 10.30a.m I went to play cricket. I came back home at 1.00 p.m. and had lunch.After finishing lunch I made a few word-searches on the computer. TO BE CONTINUED