Skip to main content

Notes on Gautam Bhatia's Article on the Relationship Between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State policy

A few months ago in school, we learnt about the relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy. The prescribed ISC textbook did not provide an adequate explanation. However, my teacher was kind enough to share an article penned by Gautam Bhatia, an eminent Constitutional lawyer, and author who is most famously known for his book, 'The Transformative Constitution'.
Below, I have written a summary/ my notes of the article penned by him.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The constitution was not drafted with an intention for Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles to be related. There was a clear division between the two; Fundamental Rights were enforceable, and remedies existed to ensure the protection of those Rights. On the contrary, Directive Principles were un-enforceable and more ‘guiding’ in nature. The DPSPs were only politically relevant but constitutionally irrelevant. This was H.M Seervai’s understanding of Part IV (DPSPs) of the constitution. After the Re Kerala Education Bill, the Supreme Court opened up the possibility for mutual existence or ‘harmonious construction’. 
The Supreme Court understood the relationship between Part III (Fundamental Rights) and Part IV (DPSPs) in a couple of ways.

Directive Principles as Markers of Reasonableness

The Indian Constitution permits textual limitations to its Fundamental Rights. The Government is allowed to exercise ‘reasonable restrictions’ for the ‘interest of the general public’. The court decided to invoke the DPSPs to determine whether a specific act of the Government was within the ‘reasonable restriction’ that the State should be allowed to exercise. They repeatedly invoked this newly adopted principle. For example, in Cotton Mills v. State of Bombay, the question was whether states could force companies to join collective bargaining agreements and the court decided that in the broader interests of the country, the employer must conform to social legislation. 

In Chandrabhavan v. State of Mysore, the court said that fundamental rights and directive principles were ‘complementary and supplementary’. This was similarly adopted in two important cases in the 70s (Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala and Minerva Mills v. Union of India) in which the Courts rationalised the approach by defining DPSPs as ‘social goals’ and fundamental rights as ‘side-constraints’. The court then moved from a stance of DPSPs being irrelevant to being ‘at par’ with the bill of rights. The only difference is that citizens could not move the court directly to enforce them.

An example in recent times when the court observed that a certain ‘limiting right’ exercised reasonable restraint was during the Right to Education case in which they ruled that since a DPSP was advanced, the 25% quota was not in ‘clear conflict’.

Directive Principles as Interpretive Guides

After the court had in its judgements invoked Directive Principles in legal adjudication, it soon took the next possible step – using them as interpretive guides. 

An interesting case in which this was done is Balwant Raj v. Union of India, a 1966 judgement of the Allahabad High Court. An employee of the Indian Railways had contracted tuberculosis and was axed from the railways because of the ‘failure to resume duty’. Balwant Raj read the directive principle that required the State to secure the right to work in such a manner that it included only voluntary failures, but his failure was involuntary as it was due to TB. They justified this by saying that the rule that had initially resulted in his discharge from service had to be done in accordance and spirit of the DPSPs.

The court treated the Directive Principles in such a way in which it could infuse it into the law without directly enforcing them. The court has so far failed to define a coherent and precise role that the principles are meant to play in statutory interpretation. In the case of the Tamil Nadu Government handing out free television sets as gifts, the court ruled that it was valid ‘public purpose’ because it was carried out to fulfil a directive principle. 

Directive Principles as Framework Values

The consequences of the court shifting its opinion on the relevance of directive principles are incredibly crucial. On the question of affirmative action or reservation for certain communities based on caste, one can argue that it violated the right to equality or Article 16 that guaranteed the equality of opportunity in employment. It must have been a simple equal-opportunities case. However, the court thought differently. 

The court said that if the State wanted to give equal opportunity for the Depressed Classes, it would have to take note of their social and economic standing as well as the historically unequal treatment that has resulted in differential treatment being meted out to them and hence has a role of securing jobs, old age pension, medical care etc. The idea that the State has a role or obligation to help weaker sections of society has been increasingly accepted in Constitutional law. Justice Bhagwati in his opinion on the Minerva Mills case said that even when something may ‘clash with a formalistic and doctrinaire view of equality before the law……. conform to the principle of…….equality before the law in its total magnitude and dimension”. By this, Bhagwati meant that even if on the face of it, it was unequal and caused discrimination (if one read the law as it is typed), if one considered the greater good or the overall ‘magnitude and dimension’, it would be beneficial. As Ashok Kumar Thakur said, the principles of equality could be altered to carry out the Directive Principles.

You can read the full article here.

Comments

  1. Respected sir, I am fan of your blog. Myself Ramesh, third year law student at government law college mysuru. You have natural gift in writing. Wanting to make small correction sir. Justice Bhagwati was a man. You refer to honourable lordship as her. Kindly change.. continue good work...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your kind comments and useful feedback. It has been corrected now! Apologies

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Visiting the Kasturinagar (KA-03) RTO - a tumultuous but manageable experience to get a Learner's/ Driver's License without an agent/ driving school

Ask anyone, and I can guarantee that they will have a story (and in most cases, many stories) about their trip, or rather, numerous trips to the RTO for something as simple as getting a Learner's License (LL) or a Driver's License (DL). In this blog, I hope to make your life a tad bit easier by guiding you through the entire process, which may seem easy at first but is full of (overcome able) challenges if you know what you are doing. I turned 18 in January this year, and besides cutting a cake, I worked on my LL application online. I challenged myself to complete the entire LL to DL process by myself and without the help of an agent or a driving school, unlike what the majority do. The lengthy application process and multiple visits to the RTO, impressed upon me why most people decided to pay a little extra to get an agent to do it for them. Still, I was determined not to pay a single rupee more than the official cost. I succeeded.  Do note that this answer is concerning the K

Kicking off a 'political career' in an idea-based, grassroots level political party

Despite having been following politics for the longest time, and now studying it full time, I never joined a political party. When people used to ask me "who do you support?", my answer was standard, "no one". Luckily for me, ever since turning 18 and being eligible to vote, there hasn't been an election in which I'd be forced to cast my vote and tell people that I have made a definitive choice about a particular political party. At a time when politics has become ever so polarising and dirty, I couldn't be happier to associate myself with the BNP. It was in February 2020 that I was introduced to the Bengaluru NavaNiramana Party. I found their vision, leadership and ideas incredibly refreshing. Though I was aware of their launch/ kickoff meeting that took place in Freedom Park in early 2020, due to a friend's TEDx talk taking place simultaneously, I could not attend. Then, between Board Exams and the lockdown that took us all by surprise, I forgot ab

A few questions we must ask ourselves about the situation surrounding the Babri Masjid/ Ram Mandir controversy

August 5, 2020, was a historic day in India for two reasons. First, it was a year since the special status of J&K was revoked, and the state was converted into Union Territories; it resulted in it being directly controlled by the Central Government in Delhi and no longer controlled by an elected government under the federal setup. It was simultaneously followed with a year-long (and still ongoing) internet and communications blockade. Second, it was a day celebrated by right-wing Hindu nationalists because of the  ground-bre aking ceremony (Bhoomi Pooja/ Puja) that was held to begin construction of a temple for Lord Ram; a temple being built on a land where a mosque that was demolished by close allies of the BJP in 1992 lay. Reaching this point was not easy. It was a struggle that lasted for decades, multiple cases in court, contributions from the Archaeological Survey of India, claims of Muslims invaders building a mosque over a temple etc. The court finally ruled in favour a temp

Unsettling Signs of Fascism - India

Let me begin by removing some misconceptions that you may have based on the title. I am not calling India a Fascist State. The ruling power is not a fascist party. The article has been largely written without any prejudice or bias (debate me if I am wrong) and includes only facts which have been backed by relevant sources. Lastly, the views are personal and have not been written with anti- ruling party/ pro-opposition party viewpoints but have been written as a private individual observing from a distance. If the article seems too long or you do not have the time, read the paragraph 'What is fascism?' as well as the last paragraph 'TL;DR' and refer back to an individual case study if you find it important or need a detailed argument. What is fascism? Fascism is a rightist-totalitarian ideology that was conceptualised by Benito Mussolini in Italy and also widely copied and renamed as Nazism by Hitler in Germany. Fascism can be broadly characterised by the presenc

Vélib Bikes | A firsthand experience of Paris' Bike Sharing Scheme

Micro-mobility has always fascinated me. Back in April 2019, I test rode various Yulus which left me amazed by the concept and the ease with which I could get across town (relatively) carbon-free and cost effectively. When I was in Stockholm on an exchange trip in late 2019, I couldn't help myself but try out Bird and Lime scooters despite it costing quite a bomb. Though I can't quite remember the exact amount I paid but I remember it being upwards of 50 kronas/5 euros/400 Indian Rupees for a short 10-15 minute ride; something that was very expensive considering that I had a public transport card that allowed me to take unlimited trips across the city and to most of suburbs an hour or two away. A Vélib stand a stone's throw away from the Eiffel Tower While Bangalore has cheap modes of transport to get around the city, be it the buses, auto-rickshaws, cabs the metro or even Yulus and Bounces, one cannot say the same about cities in Europe. A single use ticket in Stockholm co

Why shows like Shark Tank are extremely misleading

Shark Tank is an American reality TV show in which " Aspiring entrepreneurs from around the world pitch their business models to a panel of investors and persuade them to invest money in their idea." . It was started in 2009 and is currently in its ninth season. The show revolves around entrepreneurs who pitch their idea to a group of 4-6 investors and hope to secure an investment from at least one of them. While the idea behind this show is not only to provide a platform for entrepreneurs to win an investment but also improve and inspire young minds who watch this show, the show is extremely misleading. In each episode, about five startups pitch their ideas to the panel. Each entrepreneur begins by introducing themself, their venture and their ask (eg. $100,000 for 10% stake). This is followed by the panel of 'sharks' questioning them about their product/idea/revenue/future plans and likewise. After this, potential investors either agree to invest or

FUD! - RBI's Decision Sends Worldwide Crypto Markets into a Tizzy - What is the actual scenario like?

India's central bank, the Reserve Bank of India on 5th April, 2018 announced that all regulated entities such as banks will not be allowed to deal with cryptocurrencies (Virtual Currencies as they call them). Banks have been told to wind up all transactions with cryptocurrency exchanges within three months. Within minutes of this announcement, Bitcoin slumped 27%. Global markets attributed the fall in price to RBI's decision as India has a pretty large cryptocurrency investor market. However, RBI's decision is outdated and virtually has no effect on investors and exchanges. Source A few months ago, couple of banks like HDFC bank had voluntarily  withdrawn from dealing with cryptocurrency exchanges. I know this as a fact as when I started investing, I initially tried to deposit money on a cryptocurrency exchange using HDFC bank as I generally used their services, but due to them pulling out, I was forced to look at other options. This was around September, 2017. Duri