Skip to main content

The Difficulty of Equal Justice: a talk at the Bangalore International Centre

It was a delight to attend a very informative talk on the legal aid and the criminal justice system at the Bangalore International Centre, last Thursday. The panellists were eminent leaders in the domain, both nationally and locally in Bangalore; Justice (Retd.) Madan B Lokur, Prof. Vijay Raghavan, Aarti Mundkur, Dr. Anup Surendranath and Monica Sakhrani.
Scroll down to the Too Long; Didn't Read (TL;DR) section if you're short on time, to get a gist of the article. It includes my personal opinions too, so don't give it a skip even if you read the entire article!

The talk began with Justice Lokur explaining his concerns with the access and quality of legal aid provided to under-trials. He said that often, prisoners do not even know the status of their case because of the weak communication between legal aid lawyers and the under-trial. A report highlighting such problems that was submitted to the SC by Dr. Anup and his team has not been addressed and the debate on whether it should be made public is still ongoing. 

Prof. Raghavan posed a question about whether legal aid is even a right. He argued that it is ridiculous to expect good quality legal aid, especially when the remuneration for legal aid lawyers is paltry in most places, except Delhi where lawyers are compensated higher amounts (around INR 20k as opposed to other places like Maharashtra where the maximum compensation is about INR 7.5k and in many cases INR 750-1000). He said that the bias of the legal system against the poor is made visible because of policies such as these. Moreover, many under-trials do not trust legal aid lawyers because they are 'sarkari vakeel' (government's people) and hence their interests are opposed. He ended his initial arguments by saying that just about 50% of under-trials will recognise their lawyers in court and other half, won’t have a clue who they are,  and this is indicative of the fact that, "if you pay peanuts, you get peanuts".

Aarti Mundkur who is an unpaid representative for those who require legal representation, said that she too thought about applying to be a legal aid lawyer but upon contacting her friends who have been legal aid lawyers for four years, she realized that it was probably not worth it. Four of her friends reported that in the 4 years they have been legal aid lawyers, not one case has been allotted to them. She further echoed her concerns about the quality of lawyering today because of the lack of effective checks 10/12/15 years into the profession. She registered her alarm at the fact that barely anyone fails the Bar as well as the lack of refresher courses or training that lawyers have to take; double trouble indeed! 

Justice Lokur, when asked whether there is anything in the legal aid set up to prevent the problems that had been highlighted so far, said that the fundamental question that needs to be asked is whether the legal aid is about the money. He said that one should not become a legal aid lawyer if they are interested in the money. A question that I had for Justice Lokur but could not ask him in the Q&A session is as follows:

The matter being discussed is whether there is anything in the legal aid system's structure to prevent the problems that affect the system - low quality of lawyers, low pay, lack of incentive to become one etc. As Ms. Aarti had brought up, the quality of legal aid lawyers in Delhi is higher, arguably because of the greater financial incentive. In a society where one is driven by money, and money in many cases increases quality (think of better quality lawyers who themselves charge higher fees), by saying that one should not join the legal aid system for the money, however utopian, doesn't solve or address the problem. Hence, what can incentivise high calibre lawyers to join?

Monica Sakhrani kind of addressed the basis of my question - no one strives to be the best legal aid lawyer. 'No one has this ambition'. According to her, a system of dedicated people is required, just like in the prosecutor system. She says that lawyers have to be long term, unlike in the current situation in which most novice lawyers are the ones who undertake such positions. 
Both Prof. Raghavan and Justice Lokur agreed that more staff are required to handle cases, hand out cases, rosters etc. Offices have to be strengthened into a lawyer's office with stenographers, clerks etc. 

The panel then moved onto discussing the overcrowding of jails. 
They agreed that the notion that any problem can be solved by sending a person to jail must be changed. For example, a jail sentence for petty offences such as littering makes bare minimum sense because we already have an overcrowding problem and jailing people for minor offences is a waste (pun unintended). Alternatives to jail sentences are hardly ever spoken about. The Probation of Offender's Act allows those who have not been sentences to life imprisonment or death to be sent back to the community by a Probation Officer once a social enquiry report is furnished. However, these provisions are hardly exercised. As long as we say that imprisonment is the only way forward, nothing can be done. The only alternative is increasing the number of jails. Aarti added that there is no political will to keep under trials out of prisons. For example, even when a person gets bail for one case, they virtually do not leave prison because another case will be subsequently filed which will get them re-arrested. It is heart wrenching that cases filed in 2009 are heard about 10 years later, today. 
Monica Sakhrani reminded the panel and the audience that the overcrowding situation may be a bit exaggerated because certain figures indicate that the overcrowding rate is only 118%, which is no doubt indicative of overcrowding, but not to the extent that we may assume it to be.

The final 'Constitutional Question' that was posed to the Justice was whether the Constitutional silence on legal aid in the pre-trial stage indicate some sort of punishment. It is only in the trial stage that it is provided. There is no doubt that the Constitutional discussion with legal aid is extremely weak.

TL;DR
The talk exposed the problems of the justice system and how it is tilted in favour of the rich. A rich person can afford the best of lawyers (in plural!) to fight their case but a poor person is left with someone who has no incentive to fight for them. The lack of a political will to solve the problem is displayed on two fronts - first, with instances such as cases not being allotted to registered legal aid lawyers, and second, with the Constitutional silence on legal aid at the pre-trial stage. According to me, as opposed to what Justice Lokur had to say, a financial incentive is important to ensure the increase in quality. Even if financial incentives in the form of higher compensation is not given, perks can be given. Think about a civil servant. The salary is 'meagre', when compared with the service they render but the perks associated with it, result in thousands of students sitting the UPSC. Why can't similar perks be given to those lawyers rendering legal aid instead of just low fees such as INR 750? In the Q&A session, a legal aid lawyer said that she faces problems even getting paid the small fees that she is entitled to. This makes it difficult for her to travel to the jail and back, which no doubt, affects her functioning as an efficient lawyer. 
This area of law requires a radical transformation. The Constitutional silence fails to help advance the cause to fix the problem. 


Comments

  1. The prevalent malaise afflicting the compensation structure in India, not just for legal aid lawyers, but for anything that is deemed a second-grade or unimportant service is very disturbing.

    A public prosecutor representing the state probably has a higher motivation than a government-appointed legal aid for a private citizen.

    The irony of this is that, if the private citizen has committed a small crime, he is doomed and there is no support. If he has committed a mega crime, like asasinating the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, you will have the free privilege of Ram Jethmalani volunteering to fight your case. Which means everyone is looking at their private interest, which can be either money or a news-making fame opportunity.

    The system is screwed up!


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that it is only natural that people will look at private interest. Hence, the Government should be creating schemes to ensure that their 'interests' are taken care of to attract top notch lawyers! Otherwise, the quality of lawyers is going to remain abysmally low.

      Delete
  2. I'm gone to inform my little brother, that he should also visit this weblog
    on regular basis to obtain updated from most up-to-date news.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, and I hope that I will be able to keep up my quality of blogging to the standards you expect!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Visiting the Kasturinagar (KA-03) RTO - a tumultuous but manageable experience to get a Learner's/ Driver's License without an agent/ driving school

Ask anyone, and I can guarantee that they will have a story (and in most cases, many stories) about their trip, or rather, numerous trips to the RTO for something as simple as getting a Learner's License (LL) or a Driver's License (DL). In this blog, I hope to make your life a tad bit easier by guiding you through the entire process, which may seem easy at first but is full of (overcome able) challenges if you know what you are doing. I turned 18 in January this year, and besides cutting a cake, I worked on my LL application online. I challenged myself to complete the entire LL to DL process by myself and without the help of an agent or a driving school, unlike what the majority do. The lengthy application process and multiple visits to the RTO, impressed upon me why most people decided to pay a little extra to get an agent to do it for them. Still, I was determined not to pay a single rupee more than the official cost. I succeeded.  Do note that this answer is concerning the K

Kicking off a 'political career' in an idea-based, grassroots level political party

Despite having been following politics for the longest time, and now studying it full time, I never joined a political party. When people used to ask me "who do you support?", my answer was standard, "no one". Luckily for me, ever since turning 18 and being eligible to vote, there hasn't been an election in which I'd be forced to cast my vote and tell people that I have made a definitive choice about a particular political party. At a time when politics has become ever so polarising and dirty, I couldn't be happier to associate myself with the BNP. It was in February 2020 that I was introduced to the Bengaluru NavaNiramana Party. I found their vision, leadership and ideas incredibly refreshing. Though I was aware of their launch/ kickoff meeting that took place in Freedom Park in early 2020, due to a friend's TEDx talk taking place simultaneously, I could not attend. Then, between Board Exams and the lockdown that took us all by surprise, I forgot ab

The Young Adults Series at the Bangalore International Centre

 November 2020 With France reimposing lockdown restrictions, closing universities, and restricting people's movement to just 1 hour per day, I decided to fly back to India. My rationale was simple; rather than attending online classes in a foreign city, with no roommates, no extra-curricular activities during which I would have usually interacted with people, and it being illegal to meet anyone you are not living with, it made more sense to return to a safer environment in which I could enjoy more freedom, as Bangalore was in a pretty good state, at least compared to France.  While waiting to board my flight at Charles de Gaulle Airport, I was mindlessly scrolling through Instagram and came across a post published by the Bangalore International Centre . Clickbait-ly titled  'MUN Ki Baat'  (for those who don't get the reference: PM Modi has a monthly radio show called 'Man Ki Baat'), it piqued my curiosity, and I found myself watching a recording of it. When I in

A few questions we must ask ourselves about the situation surrounding the Babri Masjid/ Ram Mandir controversy

August 5, 2020, was a historic day in India for two reasons. First, it was a year since the special status of J&K was revoked, and the state was converted into Union Territories; it resulted in it being directly controlled by the Central Government in Delhi and no longer controlled by an elected government under the federal setup. It was simultaneously followed with a year-long (and still ongoing) internet and communications blockade. Second, it was a day celebrated by right-wing Hindu nationalists because of the  ground-bre aking ceremony (Bhoomi Pooja/ Puja) that was held to begin construction of a temple for Lord Ram; a temple being built on a land where a mosque that was demolished by close allies of the BJP in 1992 lay. Reaching this point was not easy. It was a struggle that lasted for decades, multiple cases in court, contributions from the Archaeological Survey of India, claims of Muslims invaders building a mosque over a temple etc. The court finally ruled in favour a temp

Ministry of Railways 'Disposes Of' my RTI request regarding deaths on (Shramik) trains

Similar to the Vande Bharath Mission that was launched by the Indian Government to repatriate Indian nationals stranded abroad during the COVID-19 pandemic (when regular flight operations were banned across the country), the Government of India launched the much-needed project to enable reverse-migration of its nation's most destitute - our migrants. Migrant labourers who are typically from rural parts of India, due to a loss of income, livelihood, coupled with a fear of catching the virus and 'wanting to die at home', began walking back to their villages, at times 1000s of kilometres away. With all trains and buses ceasing operations, their journey was on foot, in back of trucks, and has resulted in many deaths. At the same time, it has shown their grit and determination with heart-breaking stories of people like the 15-year-old girl who cycled 1200 km with her father to reach home. After not even acknowledging the problem for over a month, the Government launched special

How the Indira Canteen is a Failure and a Success

Source Indira Canteen is a fast food joint that has been touted as CM Siddaramaiah 's pet project in the city of Bengaluru, Karnataka. The canteen aims to serve 500 people per meal per day. Rahul Gandhi inaugurated this populist scheme of the Congress led Karnataka Government on Independence Day 2017. This was done in run up to the Karnataka Assembly Elections that is taking place five days from today. All 197 wards have their own Indira Canteen, built at a cost of approximately INR 30 lakhs each {1} . The setting up of this canteen is obviously to reduce hunger among the poor. Indira Canteen serves food at heavily subsidized rates by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike. Breakfast can be availed at Rs. 5 and lunch at Rs. 10. The entire scheme has been well thought of and according to reports has been running smoothly {2} . The canteens are still operational (this is itself a major win for the Government), food is being cooked at remote locations by companies to whom thi

Micro Light

What we did On the 6th of November 2011 my family friends and my family went on a Micro Light plane ride. The plane was a two seater. All of us got a chance to ride on it. When we were in the air we were allowed to steer the plane. Then we could align the plane to the runway. When my mother went in the plane the pilot decided to scare us by flying over our heads and our car!! When the oldest one in our group went there was so much wind that the plane went in another direction! It was a nice and wonderful. About the plane  The plane is manufactured in Bangalore. Only the engine is imported from Australia. The plane weighs about 200 kgs without people inside. The plane can carry on 200 kgs of additional weight. We took off at 65- 75 kms/h. When we were in the air we were at a speed of 80- 90 kms/h. The plane flew at 600 feet. It can go only up to 1000 feet. About Jakkur Airfield (Where we took off). Airport Type: Public Location: Bangalore Length of the runway: ft